Giving an attitude that pervades the internet attention isn't negative, it's just illuminating. It becomes negative if that's all a place does. But this site steers well clear of that, this is just one thread. Again, what's the real issue here.
Maybe we should just quietly pretend the article, author and belief system isn't out there long enough until it's actually out there. Can we then point, laugh and criticize?
I think you're implying that by simply noticing this person's opinion, we're giving it worth. But this ignores that his opinion isn't just passing by unnoticed until the media hopped in. MRAs don't exist because their opinions' have been marginalized into the corners of the internet never to be seen my the standard public.
A lot of the MRA stuff leaks its precum into conservative talk radio which has a large audience of morons who eat it up.
By Fenderputty Go To PostI think you're implying that by simply noticing this person's opinion, we're giving it worth. But this ignores that his opinion isn't just passing by unnoticed until the media hopped in. MRAs don't exist because their opinions' have been marginalized into the corners of the internet never to be seen my the standard public.
Nothing wrong with noticing this. Having it a part of social media regurgitation is something else. It's on the Telegraph, Huffpo, Mary Sue, Salon, The Daily Dot, etc.
And thanks to the explosion, I learned the website hates MRAs because they value gender equality. Doesn't fit the narrative, but the people that feast off of this don't care.
The weird thing is I wasn't the defensive one here. If I was attacking anything, it's social media. And if it had anything to do with anyone here, it was the way press has lowered down to forum nonsense so much that the forum lols feed a ridiculous press.
That some of you took that personally should give you pause.
By etiolation Go To PostNothing wrong with noticing this. Having it a part of social media regurgitation is something else. It's on the Telegraph, Huffpo, Mary Sue, Salon, The Daily Dot, etc.
what exactly is so upsetting about those places laughing at these pricks too? I honestly don't understand where you're coming from at all.
By etiolation Go To PostNothing wrong with noticing this. Having it a part of social media regurgitation is something else. It's on the Telegraph, Huffpo, Mary Sue, Salon, The Daily Dot, etc.breh
And thanks to the explosion, I learned the websites hates MRAs because they value gender equality. Doesn't fit the narrative, but the people that feast off of this don't care.
The weird thing is I wasn't the defensive one here. If I was attacking anything, it's social media. And if it had anything to do with anyone here, it was the way press has lowered down to forum nonsense so much that the forum lols feed a ridiculous press.
That some of you took that personally should give you pause.
if you would just be honest about your own shit instead of confusing yourself in your own argument, then you wouldn't have to waste everyone's time on this pathetic misdirection aimed at the media overall
I am being honest. Saying I haven't is like the only thing in this discussion that's actually upset me.
By etiolation Go To PostI am being honest. Saying I haven't is like the only thing in this discussion that's actually upset me.being honest about what? clickbait? dude - the op is deliberate in ripping the entire article, for laughs, from the site in order to give everyone the option of avoiding clicks. so that's deaded. then, on top of that, damn near everyone here is on a point-and-laugh run, so the idea that this is giving 'strength' to the author which would perpetuate things/reasons is deaded. then there's the whole media as a whole argument that again has zero basis on what's occurring here. also deaded.
then on top of that, no one is even baiting you. like, if people wanted to - they'd go in on your whole "what IS an association with a group really?" post
people are literally going out of their way for you lol
The OP is the returnofkings post. I didn't say this thread or the OP was clickbait. Nowhere did I say that.
I talked about the Time article a bit. I said there's a lot of fingerprints on a movie and the film itself is likely just a good Mad Max film and a good action film. IMWTB19 took that I was comparing the verbage of the two articles. I was comparing them because I saw them as fuel for stupid internet warfare. That stupidity happened. I then criticized social media. I said that this is not news. I said news and forum posts shouldn't look so much alike. I felt this took an idiot and gave him a larger podium. Feeding the troll.
So the question is: who have you been talking to that you think is me?
edit: Also the gamergate thing was an out of nowhere bait. So there's been baiting. I just rolled my eyes at it.
I talked about the Time article a bit. I said there's a lot of fingerprints on a movie and the film itself is likely just a good Mad Max film and a good action film. IMWTB19 took that I was comparing the verbage of the two articles. I was comparing them because I saw them as fuel for stupid internet warfare. That stupidity happened. I then criticized social media. I said that this is not news. I said news and forum posts shouldn't look so much alike. I felt this took an idiot and gave him a larger podium. Feeding the troll.
So the question is: who have you been talking to that you think is me?
edit: Also the gamergate thing was an out of nowhere bait. So there's been baiting. I just rolled my eyes at it.
Better question is what the fuck are you talking about this entire time. Its been nothing but loose at best comparisons and how much you don't care.
By DY_nasty Go To PostBetter question is what the fuck are you talking about this entire time. Its been nothing but loose at best comparisons and how much you don't care.
So you were full of shit. That's fine.
By etiolation Go To PostSo you were full of shit. That's fine.i'm sure that makes you feel better.
meanwhile, everyone else is like "we're all laughing at this article... and this dude brings up time magazine and the effects of social media and how clickbait feeds toxicity.... k"
By etiolation Go To PostNothing wrong with noticing this. Having it a part of social media regurgitation is something else. It's on the Telegraph, Huffpo, Mary Sue, Salon, The Daily Dot, etc.
I'm not sure why you think it's OK to notice this, but it's not OK for the media and who's following the media to pay notice as well.
Gamergate is a hate group born out of the twin piles of shit of crass consumerism and hate for women, full stop. MRAs like the space waste who wrote the piece in the OP are one of their tentacles. Choosing to associate with it means you cosigning what they're about.
Own it or break
Own it or break
By Labor Go To PostGamergate is a hate group born out of the twin piles of shit of crass consumerism and hate for women, full stop. MRAs like the space waste who wrote the piece in the OP are one of their tentacles. Choosing to associate with it means you cosigning what they're about.LOL
Own it or break
By db Go To PostGood place to plug this: http://shitpeoplesaytowomendirectors.tumblr.com/
Christ...
By Labor Go To PostGamergate is a hate group born out of the twin piles of shit of crass consumerism and hate for women, full stop. MRAs like the space waste who wrote the piece in the OP are one of their tentacles. Choosing to associate with it means you cosigning what they're about.
Own it or break
*slow clap*
http://jezebel.com/the-new-mad-max-film-is-so-feminist-my-scrotum-killed-i-1705273679
Just gonna leave this here..
Just gonna leave this here..
By Vahagn Go To Posthttp://jezebel.com/the-new-mad-max-film-is-so-feminist-my-scrotum-killed-i-1705273679
Just gonna leave this here..
Saw that on my FB feed the other day. Seems more Onion than Jezebel.
By Zero Tolerance Go To PostSaw that on my FB feed the other day. Seems more Onion than Jezebel.
It's completely sarcastic and meant to be as such. It's one big "let's poke fun at and laugh at" the writer/believers of the article in the OP.
In fact, all of the links, are to random MRA's saying really stupid ass shit. It's brilliant. One of the links is to a guy that said "Women as heroes is such a turn off" (his profile pic is him flexing his bicep in front of a mirror)
HAHAHAHAH.